Joker

Rating: R
Runtime: 2 hours, 1 minutes
Director: Todd Phillips

Quick Impressions:
Joker won the Golden Lion at the Venice Film Festival, so we had to see it even though we kept hearing rumors of a credible threat of an attack on a theater somewhere in Texas (where we live). But, I mean, Texas is a big state, and the shooting was supposed to happen on Friday night, so we went on Thursday. My husband and I were relieved not to be shot, though. Each of us independently came up with a plan in case the shooting did occur. Both plans involved hiding behind the seats in the top row (where we always sit). I mean, it’s a big auditorium. I figured the shooter might get tired climbing all those stairs. My husband’s plan involved sneaking onto the elevator.

“What if there’s a second shooter waiting at the elevator doors?” I wondered.

“If that elevator door opens in the middle of the movie,” my husband decided, “I’m just going to bum-rush the guy.”

We then mutually agreed that “the guy” would probably some woman carrying a bunch of popcorn, and then we’d be banned from the theater.

All joking aside, we thought that particular theater would be pretty safe because they barely let you carry in anything bigger than a coin purse, and there’s always a police presence.  Plus, I would not be surprised if some of this talk about dark web chatter is just an annoying way of drumming up publicity for the movie (or perhaps a way of distracting the public from more pressing issues). But then as we walked into our screening, the entire staff of ushers had gathered to be quizzed by a manager about how to proceed with evacuation if a threat became tangible. So that was a bit unnerving. But in the very same area, they were giving out free Joker posters. (The strange pairing made me think fondly of Treehouse of Horror. “The frogurt is also cursed.” I actually did notice one guy who came in after us carrying his poster in a strange way, and wondered if he was using it to conceal a handgun.)


Nobody was killed during our screening of the film, though I was a bit disturbed by my tendency to profile every other patron who moved. (To be fair, anyone could shoot up a theater, but it’s easier to relax if the person leaving his seat is not a twitchy-looking, young, white male there alone.)

The Good:
Within five minutes (maybe even five seconds), I found myself thinking, “I may have an indefensible antipathy for Joaquin Phoenix, but it’s impossible not to notice that he’s a better actor” than some people who have attempted to play the Joker recently. (I actually really like Jared Leto, but I’m not sure what went wrong there.) Phoenix knows how to play a creepy weirdo. He excels in that type of role. The movie isn’t even on ten minutes before we’ve felt the pathetic charm, the pitiable confusion, and the genuine menace all mixed up in Arthur Fleck. For obvious reasons, Phoenix’s mannerisms sometimes reminded me of other famous Jokers, but the iconic performance I thought of most when watching the film was Anthony Perkins in Psycho. Norman Bates has a boyish charm, whereas Arthur Fleck has childlike helplessness, but the undercurrent of real menace is the same. That’s what makes a character like this so disturbing. Arthur does not deserve the cruel treatment he receives from the world in general, but still, he is dangerous.

Phoenix is definitely Oscar-worthy here. Of course, he usually is. I don’t know why I think I dislike him so much. Honestly, I usually admire his work. I’ve heard about so many excellent performances this year that I’ve not yet seen. Pitted against the stars of Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, Phoenix is probably better, or at least just as good. His role is demanding and difficult in a different way than DiCaprio’s.

I blew my daughter’s mind recently when I pointed out the guy in the Joker trailer is the same actor as the little kid who’s best friends with the robot in Space Camp. Honestly, though, as I watched the actual movie, the comparison stopped seeming so mind-boggling. The adult Phoenix sounds more like his child-self here than in any other film I’ve seen him in. The sweet earnestness of that young voice coupled with the disturbing grimaces of the gaunt adult face creates one thoroughly unsettling performance.

Frances Conroy is also fantastic, mainly because she just seems so perfect for the part. I enjoyed Robert DeNiro, too, although his supporting role is relatively small.  (I like the way Phoenix mimics DeNiro’s body language and dancing, while DeNiro himself seems to be mimicking Jack Nicholson’s Joker.)  (I need to rewatch the 60s Batman to study Cesar Romero’s movements now.  Perhaps Nicholson was mimicking him, but that’s not the way I remember his movements.)  Zazie Beetz ends up with kind of an unusual part, but I like her in the role.  I also really enjoyed Shea Whigham and Bill Camp as the police detectives.  They seemed so honest for Gotham City PD and so perplexed by the weird twists and turns they discovered in their case.

I found the movie’s Star Warsy twist genuinely unexpected and more satisfying than almost else in the film.  (In fact, I think it satisfied me because it seemed so obsessively grounded in our existing pop culture which cannot seem to help regurgitating tropes we have responded well to in the past.)  This is very much a movie of the moment, and I have never seen a Thomas Wayne (Brett Cullen) who reminded me so much of Donald Trump.  The film does do an excellent job of tapping into the public’s love/hate of celebrities, leaders, and authority figures.
Best Scene:
My favorite moment in the film is when Arthur invites Gary (Leigh Gill) to his show that evening (because you know he’s going to).  His behavior here is so unpredictable to Gary, yet so predictable to the audience.  
But I also really loved the opening of the film.  All the background noise.  Here’s the news, and it’s non-stop, and it won’t shut up, and it’s all bad.  Put on a happy face.  Right away the movie tapped into something I can really relate to.  I’m sure this resonated with other viewers, too.

Best Scene Visually:
The trailer shows the moment I love best, Arthur in his Joker make-up dancing down the staircase.  I love the look he ends up with as Joker.  (His dancing is great.  A little bit Chaplin, a little bit DeNiro channeling Nicholson.)
Overall, I love the look of this film, gritty 1980s Gotham.  That’s what we appear to be getting.  I love Lawrence Sher’s cinematography.  Honestly, as the film opened, I thought, “This looks a bit like Taxi Driver,” and that kind of stuck with me the whole way through.  It’s not just that Robert DeNiro is such a presence.  The movie just looks and feels like Taxi Driver.  (And I realize that would be 1970s Gotham, but for some reason, the movie kept reminding me of reality back when the 1989 Batman came out.)
Best Action Sequence:
All of the scenes of Joker’s violence are visceral and bloody and oddly satisfying.  Now this last part is somewhat strange to me because ordinarily, I find graphic, bloody, gory violence repulsive, something to be endured if I otherwise enjoy the movie.  On paper, evil often sounds strangely seductive to me.  But then, when I see it acted out with real blood and gristle, I’m like, “Eww.  No thanks.  That’s horrible.”  For example, I absolutely love Iago when I read Othello, but any dramatization of the play always disturbs and horrifies me.  Maybe I’m just a sucker for a smooth talker, I don’t know.  Maybe it’s that we can all identify with dark and disturbing thoughts, but when those feelings and ideas are translated into broken jaws and bloody entrails, you lose most of us.
I did like the graphic violence in Joker, though.  I enjoyed those scenes.  They were very satisfying.  Maybe it’s because you know you’re watching a familiar character, so you want to see him become the version of himself you’re beginning to recognize.  Much of what makes these scenes appealing is Phoenix’s performance.  It’s nice to see his suffering and torment lessen a bit, even if that torment is briefly turning to joy because he’s gunning people down and knifing them with scissors.
After saying all this, though, I’m going to surprise you by also saying that my favorite action scene takes place in Arkham Asylum and mostly just involves running.  This part is great.  For one thing, Brian Tyree Henry randomly shows up.  I feel like he’s in every movie now, but I’m always glad to see him.  Also, I just love Phoenix’s desperate, determined energy in this scene.  I’m totally rooting for Arthur here.  This is the second mad rush through an insane asylum I’ve seen on screen this fall, and it’s creepier here than in Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark (though I absolutely loved that film).
On a side note, I have heard this film is unrelated to the next Batman movie, but I really wish it weren’t.  Will they at least make another of these?  I’d love to see more of this Gotham where Phoenix’s Joker is on the loose and Brian Tyree Henry works at Arkham Asylum, while Bill Camp and Shea Whigham are baffled at the new wave of crime.
Most Oscar Worthy Performance, Joaquin Phoenix:
If Phoenix’s performance were bad, this film would be a grotesque disaster.  I don’t know that he’ll get a Best Actor nomination, but I’m sure a lot of people will be angry if he doesn’t.  Without him, the movie would fail.  His performance is nuanced, subtle, big, sympathetic, menacing, sad, joyous, and creepy all at once.  
The scene where he’s fixing his shoes makes you gasp.  He looks so disturbingly emaciated.  I mean like Christian Bale emaciated.  I’m sure it’s not easy to get your body into that state.  
I do think being creepy and menacing might come a bit naturally to Phoenix.  I’ve seen him do it well so many times.  But that laugh of his is one of my favorite elements of the entire movie.  For one thing, he does it so well.  It is difficult to play a character with a physical or verbal tic like this and not appear to be overdoing it.  I think the movie is smart to explain and use the laugh in this way.  Phoenix practically builds his performance around it.  A lesser actor would just make a fool of himself trying to pull this off and failing.
Maybe best I like his fantasy sequence with Robert DeNiro juxtaposed against the reality of their interactions.  That’s less a scene than half the movie, but I can’t help that.
The Negatives:
I’m definitely on this movie’s side when I hear it accused of inciting violence and glorifying evil. Those kinds of complaints are a pet peeve of mine. I feel that the people who lodge them must not have read any great books lately. Such complaints betray a fundamental lack of understanding of what fiction is and how it works. I guess I’m really quite a snob about this, truth be told. I mean, if you don’t appreciate art, then that’s your right, and I won’t tell you I think less of you for it. But I mean, candidly, I think there’s something broken inside people who believe all literature should be The New England Primer.

That said, I did find myself wincing at the way this movie unfolds. People are going to find it so easy to point to Joker and say, “Yep! That’s who does all the mass murdering in this country all right, the tragically under-institutionalized mentally ill.”

I’m positive some people will watch this and say, “Yep, tormented, unbalanced people like Arthur become society’s mass murderers.” But, no, no. The truth is tormented, unbalanced people like Arthur become writers and actors. They become artists. They have feelings and observations like Arthur’s, and they funnel them into creative projects like this to make a statement. (And it works. When we left the theater, practically everybody was standing around in small groups in the parking lot discussing the film.)

In real life, someone as mentally ill as Arthur is far less likely to commit these acts than to have delusions of committing them.

Before seeing the movie, I had seen a lot of nonsense on the internet about Joker being a film for incels, glorifying the grotesque, violent fantasies of fans who are involuntarily celibate and angry at the world because they believe they’re owed sex. I know that such people do exist and that most of the garbage they spew is vile, and some have turned violent. But that’s a mischaracterization of what’s going on in this movie. Arthur is angry because he actually has been abused a great deal. And after years of seeking justice, he finally realizes that the system is broken. And he accepts the fact that he is broken, too. Instead of working so hard to please a world that doesn’t care about him, he simply starts doing whatever he feels like all the time. Once he realizes just how rotten and corrupt the world around him truly is, he can stop lamenting that he is broken and start celebrating his brokenness.

Self-proclaimed incels may indeed love this movie, but that doesn’t mean it’s just for them. They haven’t cornered the market on thinking society is corrupt and broken. The real danger is probably to corrupt politicians. Seeing this movie may spark things like discussions, thinking, realizations, civic involvement, voting. Or it may make some people say, “I think DC has finally turned a corner and found something to say, and Marvel is getting too formulaic.” Both of these things seem far more likely than the movie prompting all who see it to transform into murderous clowns. And it certainly does not give anyone the excuse or the idea to treat women with contempt. That is not what this film is about at all.

I do think Joker somewhat irresponsibly makes mental illness appear to be a liberating and enviable state and suggests that people too poor to afford proper healthcare often go on murderous rampages. Admittedly, though, a film focused entirely on the origin story of the Joker would have a hard time avoiding this.

I also found Hildur Guðnadóttir’s score abysmally depressing, but maybe that’s a compliment when it comes to a film like this.
My biggest complaint is that I wanted to feel more at the end.  The movie seemed to lack a final twisting of the knife.  But that is another difficulty that arises from looking at the world from the point of view of the villain.  Maybe the movie does fail the audience in some way.  Yes, we can certainly identify with the frustrations and motives of this villain, but isn’t it healthier to imagine yourself as a hero?  At the end of the day, Batman is kind of a delusional weirdo, too, but he makes other people feel safer.  Joker just encourages others to unleash their ids, to revel in total chaos.  Burning this rotten city to the ground may well be the best option on the first night, but you can only burn Gotham to the ground for so long before you run out of stuff to burn and have to build a new city.  Or I guess you could just sit around in the dark.  Either way, I found the ending less impressive than I sensed it felt itself to be.  I wanted a little more.  Maybe that’s the message of the movie, though.  Joker has no more to offer.
Overall:
I am quite unstable right now.  This fall has been rough for me so far, so many of Joker’s demented musings resonated strongly with me.  To be honest, though, watching the movie didn’t make me depressed at all.  In fact, it cheered me up.  I enjoyed Phoenix’s take on a difficult character, and I thought the film was extremely well made and thoroughly watchable if ultimately just the tiniest bit less satisfying than I suspect it intended.  This is a good film, and if you’re looking for an evening’s diversion at the theater, you could do a lot worse.  I hope the next Batman film is as good.  We’ll see. (I will admit that The Lighthouse looks amazing, so I’m keeping an open mind about Robert Pattinson (but Jonah Hill had better play the Riddler and not the Penguin or else that is just lazy casting).
Back to Top